Evolution of Mediation Praxis

From Traditional Models to the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Mediator Training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61243/calamo.25.504

Keywords:

Mediation, Legal education, Legal training, Schools of mediation, Conflict resolution, Algorithmic ethics

Abstract

This article, of a theoretical nature and from a critical approach, analyzes the transformation of training into mediation, linking traditional theoretical models with the irruption of artificial intelligence. After reviewing the classic pedagogical bases centered on communication, AI is examined as a disruptive tool that surpasses the concept of ODR (online dispute resolution), acting as an agent capable of processing data and suggesting solutions. A hybrid model is proposed that integrates algorithmic technical efficiency with human socio-emotional skills. Finally, it is concluded that the biggest challenge for training centers is to guarantee technical ethics and neutrality in the face of security, essential elements in the curriculum of a contemporary mediator. 

Author Biography

Andrés Vázquez López, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, España

He is a mediator, holds a Master’s degree in Mediation, and is a university-accredited specialist in Civil and Commercial Mediation, Family Mediation, and Intercultural and Immigration Mediation, as well as an expert in Mediation via Electronic Means and Online Dispute Resolution. He studied law at the University of Santiago de Compostela and at the National University of Distance Education, Spain. He is a teaching collaborator on the UNED’s Modular Course in Mediation, where he coordinates the modules on Electronic Mediation, Intercultural and Immigration Mediation, and Mediation in Violent Conflicts. He has participated in conferences and projects aimed at implementing virtual mediation platforms for conflict resolution, as well as in the international training of professional mediators in electronic mediation.

References

Barona Vilar, Silvia. 2021. Algoritmización del Derecho y de la justicia. De la Inteligencia Artificial a la Smart Justice. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

Bush, Robert A. Baruch, y Joseph P. Folger. 1994. The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cobb, Sara. 1993. “Empowerment and Mediation: A Narrative Perspective”. Negotiation Journal, vol. 9, núm. 3: 245-255.

Conforti, Oscar Daniel Franco. 2015. “Mediación electrónica (e-Mediación)”. Diario La Ley, núm. 8519. Acceso el 19 de mayo de 2026. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5025502

Elisavetsky, Alberto. 2013. “La Resolución de Conflictos en el Siglo XXI”. Mediate.com / Mediate University. Acceso el 19 de mayo de 2026. https://mediate.com/la-resolucion-de-conflictos-adr-odr-en-espanol/

Entelman, Remo F. 1997. “El conflicto: dilema para abogados”. Suplemento Resolución de Conflictos (R.C.) La Ley. Buenos Aires: La Ley.

García-Villaluenga, Leticia, y Eduardo Vázquez de Castro. 2022. Anuario de Mediación y Solución de Conflictos, núm. 9. Madrid: Editorial Reus.

Iglesias López, Daniel. 2026. “Desarrollo de Jarvis. Proyecto ConStan, UTSI (UNFIT Theory of Systematic Information)”. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18788987

Katsh, Ethan, y Janet Rifkin. 2001. Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Katsh, Ethan, y Orna Rabinovich-Einy. 2017. Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Munuera Gómez, María Pilar. 2017. Mediación: Una disciplina científica. Madrid: Tecnos.

Souto Galván, Esther. 2010. La Mediación, un instrumento de conciliación. Madrid: Dykinson.

Susskind, Richard. 2019. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vilalta Nicuesa, Aura Esther. 2012. “Contratación transnacional y acceso a la justicia: mecanismos de resolución electrónica de disputas”. Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario, núm. 732: 2065-2147.

Normativa

España. 2025. Proyecto de Ley de Medidas de Eficiencia Procesal del Servicio Público de Justicia. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Acceso el 19 de mayo de 2026. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2025/BOE-A-2025-76-consolidado.pdf

Unión Europea. 2024. Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 13 de junio de 2024, por el que se establecen normas armonizadas sobre inteligencia artificial (Ley de Inteligencia Artificial). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Acceso el 19 de mayo de 2026. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Vázquez López, A. (2026). Evolution of Mediation Praxis: From Traditional Models to the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Mediator Training. Revista Cálamo, (25), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.61243/calamo.25.504